<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction To the Generic Dictionary Class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vbnotebookfor.net/2007/09/05/introduction-to-the-generic-dictionary-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vbnotebookfor.net/2007/09/05/introduction-to-the-generic-dictionary-class/</link>
	<description>Articles on VB.NET and Software Development Team Leadership</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raja Lakshman</title>
		<link>http://vbnotebookfor.net/2007/09/05/introduction-to-the-generic-dictionary-class/comment-page-1/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>Raja Lakshman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbnotebookfor.net/2007/09/05/introduction-to-the-generic-dictionary-class/#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank

Great article. I am now thinking maybe I can use the Dictionary class for my Collection classes (instead of Collection(Of T) - the key can be a string and the type can be a GenericType - that way we can load the dictionary with anything and then store the dictionary in the Session - I would like to know your opinion on this - am I on the right track - or is there a better method? Thanks

Raja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank</p>
<p>Great article. I am now thinking maybe I can use the Dictionary class for my Collection classes (instead of Collection(Of T) - the key can be a string and the type can be a GenericType - that way we can load the dictionary with anything and then store the dictionary in the Session - I would like to know your opinion on this - am I on the right track - or is there a better method? Thanks</p>
<p>Raja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Somers</title>
		<link>http://vbnotebookfor.net/2007/09/05/introduction-to-the-generic-dictionary-class/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Somers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbnotebookfor.net/2007/09/05/introduction-to-the-generic-dictionary-class/#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>Good article.  I have a question.  Is it possible to enumerate through and add values to existing keys without specifing the key, just the order the key was added to the dictionary?  I have a parsed fix width string that goes through a for loop in a specfic order to get the current field.  I have a dictionary that was loaded with keys in the same DB call that loaded the int array for the setfieldwidth property of the parser.  So now I want to enumerate through the textfeild parser and add the values to the dictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  I have a question.  Is it possible to enumerate through and add values to existing keys without specifing the key, just the order the key was added to the dictionary?  I have a parsed fix width string that goes through a for loop in a specfic order to get the current field.  I have a dictionary that was loaded with keys in the same DB call that loaded the int array for the setfieldwidth property of the parser.  So now I want to enumerate through the textfeild parser and add the values to the dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

